F. X. Browne, Inc.

Sustainable Environments

September 2009

 

"When the well is dry,

we know the worth of water."

 

 

-Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790),

Poor Richard's Almanac, 1746

  

Editors Note

In last month’s edition of Sustainable Environments, I featured several articles focused on climate change and its effects on the environment.  Since then, there have been more developments made on this subject.  Climate change will cause changes to streams, lakes, forests, plants, animals and humans.  Here are some more articles detailing the changes that could take place.


Water Scarcity Looms
Population growth, climate change, pollution, lack of investment, and management failures are all factors causing water scarcity.  Several major rivers are drying up before they reach the sea and ground-water tables are falling. 

by Gary Gardner, WorldWatch Institute, August 6, 2009

http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6213?emc=el&m=279870&l=4&v=3888310d00

 
Warming Oceans May Shift Earth's Pole
A new study shows that the rise in ocean temperatures and melting ice sheets caused by climate change could shift the Earth’s axis by almost 5 feet by the end of the century.  As the ocean’s temperatures increase, the water expands, increasing seal levels.  This could push the planet’s rotational axis closer to Alaska.

By Michael Reilly, Discovery News, August 24, 2009
http://www.enn.com/top_stories/article/40384

Climate Change Could Have Negative Effects On Stream And Forest Ecosystems
As climate change causes warmer weather earlier in the growing season, streams may lose valuable algal productivity.  If canopy trees leaf out earlier, forest streams will lose their peak productivity period in spring when many stream organisms are dependent on algae for food.

ScienceDaily, August 14, 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090723142116.htm

Climate Change Could Harm Lake Fish: Light Determines Growth Of Fish In Lakes
Higher temperatures, thawing permafrost and changes in precipitation caused by climate change can cause an increase in the amount of organic materials entering latkes.  Increased organic matter causes lakes to turn brown, which in turn decreases the amount of sunlight that can penetrate the water.  This will decrease the productivity of a lake, as algae (a food source for many animals) depend on sunlight for photosynthesis.

ScienceDaily, August 18, 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090723201452.htm


~ Lisen Cummings, Sustainable Environments Editor/Designer

Topic of the Month

Pennsylvania Proposes New Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Regulations

 The Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board proposes to amend the erosion and sediment control and stormwater management regulations (25 Pa. Code Chapter 102).  Below is a summary of the PADEP explanation of the proposed changes, followed by a copy of the proposed regulations.

The amendments will  update agricultural planning and implementation requirements, update erosion and sediment  control requirements, incorporate the Federal Clean Water Act ''Phase II'' NPDES permit requirements for stormwater discharges associated with construction activities, include post construction stormwater management (PCSM) requirements, establish riparian forest buffer provisions, and include provisions for a permit-by-rule option.    

 

Background and Purpose

   The existing E&S control regulations found in 25 Chapter 102 describe the requirements for controlling accelerated erosion and preventing sediment pollution from various earth disturbance activities. The purpose of Chapter 102 is to protect surface waters of this Commonwealth from sediment and stormwater pollution by requiring the use of best management practices (BMPs) that minimize accelerated erosion and sedimentation and manage post construction stormwater runoff, both during and after earth disturbance activities.

   Since 1972, earth disturbance activities related to agricultural plowing and tilling, as well as, non-agricultural earth disturbance activities have been regulated under this chapter by requiring persons to develop, implement and maintain BMPs.

   The proposed amendments elaborated in this preamble, incorporate specific language which enhance requirements related to agriculture; clarify existing requirements for accelerated E&S control; incorporate updated Federal requirements; update permit fees; codify PCSM requirements; add requirements related to riparian forest buffers; and introduce a permit-by-rule option.

 

Enhanced requirements related to agriculture

   The scope of the agricultural section (§ 102.4(a)) is being enhanced beyond ''agricultural plowing and tilling'' to also include ''animal heavy use areas.'' The requirements related to plowing and tilling are also being more clearly defined. The animal heavy use area provisions of the proposed rulemaking require responsible parties to develop and implement an E & S Control Plan (E & S Plan) that minimizes accelerated erosion and sedimentation.

 

Clarification of existing requirements for accelerated E & S control

   Revisions to existing language are included in the proposed rulemaking to clarify definitions, plan requirements, Chapter 93 antidegradation implementation requirements, permitting and site stabilization.

 

Incorporation of updated Federal requirements

   The Federal Clean Water Act, NPDES Program includes regulatory requirements for stormwater discharges associated with construction activities. Pennsylvania is delegated administration of the NPDES program by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Chapter 102 provides the regulatory framework for the stormwater construction portion of the NPDES program in this Commonwealth. The Federal requirements for stormwater construction were promulgated by the EPA in two phases (Pennsylvania compliance required by 1992 and 2002, respectively). The Chapter 102 amendments in 2000 included the first phase ''Phase I'' of these NPDES requirements. In order to maintain delegation of the NPDES program and to be compliant with Federal law, Pennsylvania is incorporating the second phase ''Phase II'' of the Federal requirements in this proposed rulemaking.

 

Codification of PCSM requirements

   Permanent changes to the surface of the land resulting from earth disturbance activities also have the potential to cause pollution as that term is defined under both the federal Clean Water Act as well as the Clean Streams Law. This rulemaking proposes to include specific PCSM requirements, as a codification of existing practices in this Commonwealth. Since 2002, the Department has included PCSM requirements in the NPDES stormwater permitting program in response to the need for enhanced water quality protection, long-term stormwater management, streambed and streambank protection and as a flood control measure. The inclusion of PCSM requirements in this program is driven by the federal NPDES stormwater construction requirements, Environmental Hearing Board decisions, and is necessary to support implementation of stormwater management planning requirements for the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) NPDES program and the Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act (32 P. S. §§ 680.1--680.17).

 

Addition of requirements related to riparian forest buffers

   Riparian forest buffers are one of the most effective and efficient BMPs for preventing pollution both during and after earth disturbance activities, and provide natural, long-term sustainability for aquatic resource protection and water quality enhancement. This proposed rulemaking includes new requirements for protecting existing riparian forest buffers and for establishing new buffers. The rulemaking also proposes mandatory riparian forest buffers for projects permitted under Chapter 102 that contain, or are located along or within, 150 feet of Exceptional Value (EV) rivers, perennial and intermittent streams, or lakes, ponds, or reservoirs. Requirements for buffer conservation, construction and maintenance are included.

 

Introduction of a permit-by-rule option

   The proposed amendments include a new permitting option for low impact, low risk projects that incorporate riparian forest buffers. This permit-by-rule could be used to authorize qualifying projects that require either an NPDES permit or E & S control permit under this chapter. The proposed permit-by-rule balances environmental protection for this Commonwealth with predictability in permitting for the applicant. The permit-by-rule includes eligibility criteria to limit applicability to ''low-risk'' projects and conditions requiring the use of riparian forest buffers, ''low impact design'' techniques, more prescriptive plan and implementation requirements, mandatory oversight by a professional engineer, geologist or landscape architect registered in this Commonwealth, and a 30-day review time frame.

 

Public Participation and Outreach

   In the proposed rulemaking, the Department has incorporated many revisions. The Department acknowledges that the Water Resources Advisory Committee would like the Board to solicit input during the public comment period on the following three issues:

   *  Scope of the permit-by-rule: Should the proposed rulemaking limit or expand the availability of the proposed permit-by-rule?

      The permit by rule is proposed to be used for low risk projects with riparian forest buffers in High Quality and all waters other than Exceptional value. Some of the members recommended that the permit-by-rule be available for all waters (including Exceptional Value); while others recommended that it be available for use in only waters other than special protection.

   *  Responsibility for long-term PCSM operation and maintenance (O & M): How should the proposal rulemaking address responsibility for long-term operation and maintenance of PCSM BMPs?

      Assignment of the long-term O&M responsibility for PCSM has been, and continues to be, a challenging issue for the Department and regulated community. The proposed rulemaking requires the permit applicant to identify a party with long-term responsibility for operation and maintenance of PCSM BMPS, and includes a default provision that obligates either the landowner or permittee to provide that O&M function. Some members of WRAC voiced concern that the Department should be more detailed and prescriptive on how this function will be carried out.

   *  Mandatory Riparian Forest Buffers: Should the proposed rulemaking include a provision for mandatory riparian forest buffers?

      The rulemaking proposes 150-foot riparian forest buffers for permitted activities along Exceptional Value (EV) streams. Some of the members recommended that riparian forest buffers be mandatory for not only EV, but all waters, while others recommended that riparian forest buffers be used voluntarily.

 

F.  Summary of Regulatory Requirements

   Several changes are proposed in this regulatory package and are described as follows. The descriptions include a reference to the section or subsection proposed to be changed, the nature of the change and the effect of the change.

 

 

Proposed New Section 102 Regulations

§ 102.1.  Definitions

   Specific amendments include the following:

   New definitions: Act 167, Agricultural Operation, Along, Animal heavy use areas, Antidegradation Best Available Combination of Technologies, Forest stewardship plan, Intermittent stream, K Factor, Licensed professional, Nondischarge alternative, Normal pool elevation, Notice of Termination, Oil and gas activities, Perennial stream, Point source, Pollutant, Post construction stormwater, PCSM, PCSM Plan, PPC Plan, Riparian forest buffer, Soil loss tolerance, Stormwater, Surface waters and Top of streambank.

   Revised definitions:  Agricultural plowing or tilling activity, BMPs, Conservation district, Conservation plan, Diversion, Earth disturbance activity, E & S Permit, E & S Plan Municipality, NPDES, Notice of Intent, NPDES Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, Operator, Person, Project site, and Sediment.

   Definitions proposed to be deleted: Dewatering zone, Permanent pool, Principal spillway, and Skim.

 

§ 102.2. Scope and purpose.

   This section is revised to reflect the codification of existing PCSM requirements.

 

§ 102.4.  Erosion and sediment control regulations.

Agricultural Activities

   This section incorporates new terms and establishes general requirements for animal heavy use areas. The revisions clarify planning requirements for agricultural activities and soil loss tolerance values or ''T,'' and identify the conservation plan requirements that satisfy the E & S Plan requirements of this Chapter.

Non-agricultural Activities

   This section provides clarity by codifying the Department's current policy and guidelines that have been established to meet Federal requirements and to comply with court decisions. Persons proposing or conducting earth disturbance activities shall limit the extent and duration of the earth disturbance; protect existing drainage features and vegetation; minimize soil compaction; utilize measures or controls that prevent or minimize the generation of stormwater; and protect, maintain, reclaim and restore waters of this Commonwealth. Additionally an E & S Plan must be consistent with the PCSM Plan; identify naturally occurring geologic formations, or soil conditions that may have the potential to cause pollution during earth disturbance activities and include BMPs to avoid or minimize potential pollution and its impacts from such formations; utilize Chapter 93 nondischarge and ABACT BMPs in special protection waters, evaluate the potential for thermal impacts; and identify and protect existing and proposed forest riparian buffers when applicable.

 

§ 102.5.  Permit requirements.

   This section adds the federal NPDES ''Phase II'' permit requirements for earth disturbance activities between 1 and 5 acres with a point source discharge; and incorporates the antidegradation implementation requirements related to NPDES Permits in special protection waters as required by Chapter 93 and Blue Mtn. Preservation Assn. v. DEP, 2006 EHB 589. Permitting requirements are included for oil and gas activities to obtain an E&S permit for 5 acres or more of earth disturbance. Additionally, a permit requirement is included for activities involving 5 acres or more of earth disturbance not otherwise specified in this section as requiring permit coverage. Additional requirements have been included for a preconstruction meeting for all permitted activities; a general requirement that a permittee must ensure long term operation and maintenance requirements for PCSM facilities identified in § 102.8; and a provision to clarify that operators who are not the permittee shall be identified as co-permittees. Finally, the Clean Water Act NPDES permit exemption for activities covered by a Clean Water Act § 404 dredge and fill permit is clarified.

 

§ 102.6.  Permit application and fees.

   This section introduces the registration requirements for coverage under the permit-by-rule option; clarifies the existing requirement to include a PCSM Plan with a permit application, as well as the existing requirement to create a preparedness, prevention and contingency (PPC) plan when necessary. Fees for E & S permits are updated to meet program expenses. The fees for NPDES Permits for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities from Chapter 92 are incorporated and updated. Language is added to clarify the Department's obligation to review fees at least once every 3 years and to clearly define complete applications and an applicant's responsibility to provide additional information to the Department within 60 days. Additionally, the ability of conservation districts to charge additional fees pursuant to Conservation District Law is clearly outlined.

 

§ 102.7.  Permit Termination.

   This section adds an obligation to identify the person responsible for operation and maintenance of PCSM BMP and PCSM Plans and clarifies the obligation of the permittee to operate and maintain the PCSM BMPS and PCSM Plan until the Notice of Termination is acknowledged.

 

§ 102.8.  PCSM requirements.

   This new section is added to codify provisions for PCSM for all activities that require an NPDES permit for stormwater discharges from construction activities or an E & S Permit. The goals for which PCSM Plans should be designed and implemented are outlined. The components of a written PCSM Plan that includes drawings and a narrative portion are also identified. Additional requirements are also established including, the performance criteria for the PCSM BMPs; the need for a licensed professional to certify ''record drawings'' that ensure the PCSM Plan was implemented properly prior to termination of the permit; and a requirement to ensure there is a long-term operation and maintenance plan and that a responsible party is identified.

 

§  102.11.  General requirement.

   This section has been revised to include additional references.

 

§ 102.14.  Riparian forest buffer requirements.

   This section was added to describe requirements associated with the establishment of new riparian forest buffer and the protection of existing buffers along surface waters in this Commonwealth when required under Chapter 102, or which may be required by other Department rules regulations, permits, orders, or other authorizations. General requirements are added to identify a certain size, composition, quality, management, reporting, and permanent protection of riparian forest buffers when utilized to meet regulatory requirements. Finally, this section establishes a mandatory 150 foot riparian forest buffer requirement for projects permitted under Chapter 102 that are located along certain specified Exceptional Value waters.

 

§ 102.15.  Permit-by-rule for low impact projects with riparian forest buffers.

   This section provides a new permit-by-rule option in addition to existing individual and general permits. The permit-by-rule includes the following eligibility criteria: discharges to waters other than Exceptional Value; Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program requirements shall be met; applicants shall satisfy compliance history requirements; lands that are currently contaminated are excluded; and sensitive geologic formations, soils with steep slopes, wetlands and floodplains are excluded.

   The permit-by-rule conditions for use, include: a pre-submission meeting; inclusion of a riparian forest buffer (meeting the requirements of § 102.14); limit of 15 acres of disturbance at any one time during development of a project; and the retention of services of a professional engineer, geologist, or landscape architect registered in this Commonwealth to prepare and certify E & S and PCSM Plans, oversee critical stages of construction, and provide ''record drawings'' upon project completion.

   The permit-by-rule option includes a requirement for municipal notification; prescriptive planning requirements for E & S and PCSM; a 30-day review and eligibility verification and determination for coverage; and an obligation for the Department to verify the effectiveness and level of environmental protection that the permit-by-rule provides. Additionally, the permit-by-rule includes further requirements for projects in High Quality waters and waters impaired for stormwater or sediment.

 

§ 102.22.  Site stabilization.

   This section is revised to incorporate and to clarify existing requirements for permanent and temporary stabilization.

 

§ 102.32.  Compliance and enforcement provisions.

   This section adds a new provision to include an opportunity to request an informal hearing with the Department after action by a conservation district and a new provision for cost recovery by the Department or conservation district.

 

§ 102.42.  Notification of applications of permits.

   This section is revised to reference the Federal NPDES ''Phase II'' permit requirements and to be consistent with the change in § 102.5.

 

§ 102.43.  Withholding permits.

   This section clarifies language to include references to local stormwater approvals and authorizations.

F.  Benefits, Costs and Compliance

Benefits

   The citizens of the Commonwealth, the regulated community, and State and local governments will benefit from the recommended changes in this rulemaking because surface waters will be protected, maintained and improved through requirements that minimize accelerated erosion and sedimentation and strengthen PCSM.

   The proposed rulemaking provisions related to E & S control and PCSM will improve water quality and mitigate flooding potential by controlling increases in sediment and other pollutant discharges during and after earth disturbance activities. Controlling the discharges through this rulemaking will limit the risk for increased pollutant levels to waters of this Commonwealth, and protect against adverse impacts on aquatic ecosystems. To ensure protection against adverse impacts from stormwater runoff, the proposed rulemaking includes provisions for long-term operation and maintenance of PCSM facilities. In support of the Federal NPDES Stormwater Construction rulemakings the EPA also cited: benefits to navigation in the reduced sediment loads requiring dredging; benefits to water storage in reservoirs - again as a result of regained capacity from reduced sediment build-up; benefits to drinking water treatment - in terms of reduced costs for treatment for sediment in turbidity; as well as water quality.

   The Commonwealth will benefit from increased permit fees that are based in part on the estimated cost of administering the program. Revisions to Chapter 92 in 1999 and Chapter 102 in 2000 included modifications to permit fees, but these were administrative filing fees and did not cover cost of program operations. This proposed rulemaking is the first effort by the Department to cover the Chapter 102 program costs through permit fees.

   The regulated community is expected to benefit from these regulatory revisions through the restructuring and clarification of planning and permit application requirements, as well as the codification of the existing PCSM requirements. This rulemaking reflects a continuing commitment to integrate regulatory obligations for stormwater management including requirements underto Act 167, the NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) program and permitting of earth disturbance activities. Local governments with State Act 167 or NPDES MS4 regulatory obligations may rely on the regulatory structure provided by this proposed rulemaking. This reliance on existing State stormwater programs represents a significant cost savings to local governments.

   Finally, these regulatory revisions are beneficial because they continue to support the delegation of the E & S control and stormwater management programs to local county conservation districts. County conservation districts and the Department have had a successful and effective partnership that allows the Commonwealth to meet the Federal requirements of the NPDES program. Additionally, the delegation to the local government provides more accessibility to the community and regulated parties and ensures local involvement in oversight of the program.

Compliance Costs

   These regulatory revisions should not result in significant increased compliance costs for persons proposing or conducting earth disturbance activities. Moderate increased costs may be incurred due to: increased permit application fees for activities requiring permits; PCSM Plan licensed professional oversight and preparation of record drawings; and long-term operation and maintenance of PCSM facilities.

   Generally, there may be cost savings as a result of eliminating the outdated and unnecessary requirements, while increasing the protection of this Commonwealth's valuable water resources. Additionally, the emphasis in the proposed rulemaking on nonstructural ''low-impact'' stormwater management approaches should result in lower long-term operation and management costs. The permit-by-rule may provide the regulated community cost savings through a new permitting option that provides a definitive timeframe for review and determination of coverage.

Compliance Assistance Plan

   The Department assists the regulated community in complying with these regulations through technical and educational assistance, largely provided in partnership with county conservation districts. These efforts have resulted in local community based initiatives that stimulate awareness and achieve regulatory compliance. Department staff have worked with conservation districts to develop and enhance their professional abilities. The development of compliance strategies that focus on negotiation, total quality management, mediation, and professional development, has greatly enhanced the Department's ability to protect this Commonwealth's water resources. County conservation district staff provide an efficient and effective local source of assistance as well as an efficient mechanism for the protection of valuable resources. Evaluations of district performance have shown that district staff can provide a quick response to process, review, and acknowledge permit applications.

   By involving various advisory committees in the development of these regulations, and pursuing initiatives with the regulated community and other stakeholders, the Department's outreach efforts have allowed stakeholders to work together with regulators to work towards the goal of protecting water quality and the aquatic environment through E & S control and stormwater management efforts. Involvement of the public and the regulated community in the development of these regulations fosters subsequent compliance with standards and practices developed as a result of these efforts, and are an important form of compliance assistance.

   The Department assists the regulated community with compliance by its development of standard checklists, worksheets and permit review letters to aid plan designers in developing sound pollution prevention plans. The Department also assists compliance by assuring that Department and district reviews are timely, effective, and consistent. Finally, the regulations incorporate a performance-based approach, which allows persons conducting earth disturbance broad latitude and flexibility in designing BMPs to achieve compliance.

Paperwork Requirements

   The majority of the revisions to this proposed rulemaking are codifications of existing requirements, therefore only minor changes to forms, fact sheets, and technical guidance are anticipated.

G.  Pollution Prevention

   Chapter 102 prevents sediment and stormwater pollution to surface waters of this Commonwealth from earth disturbance activities through a tiered regulatory framework built upon BMP requirements. The chapter covers both agricultural and nonagricultural earth disturbance activities, with distinct regulatory requirements for these two broad categories. Regardless of the category, all earth disturbance activities must utilize BMPs to minimize accelerated erosion and sedimentation for the duration of earth disturbance activities. Additionally, some earth disturbance activities require preparation of a written E & S Plan. Finally, earth disturbance activities exceeding specified acreage thresholds may trigger the requirement to obtain permit coverage, which in turn includes the obligation to prepare and implement a written PCSM Plan.

   The proposed rulemaking will improve protection from earth disturbance activities not only through the inclusion of PCSM requirements, but also through the addition of the riparian forest buffer provisions, which are one of the most effective and sustainable BMPs for protecting, maintaining, reclaiming and restoring surface waters of this Commonwealth.

   Effective pollution prevention also requires robust inspection, oversight, and enforcement authority, which are retained and enhanced in this rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking adds requirements such as: mandatory pre-construction meetings; licensed professional documentation requirements; and a program audit provision to verify the environmental protection and effectiveness of the permit-by-rule.

H.  Sunset Review

   These regulations will be reviewed in accordance with the sunset review schedule published by the Department to determine whether the regulations effectively fulfill the goals for which it was intended.

I.  Regulatory Review

   Under Section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), the Department submitted a copy of the proposed rulemaking on August 18, 2009, to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC), and the Chairpersons of the Senate and House Environmental Resources and Energy Committees. In addition to submitting the proposed amendments, the Department has provided IRRC and the Committees with a copy of a detailed Regulatory Analysis Form prepared by the Department. A copy of this material is available to the public upon request.

   Under section 5(g) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC may convey any comments, recommendations or objections to the proposed regulations within 30 days of the close of the public comment period. The Act specifies detailed procedures for review of these issues by the Department, the General Assembly and the Governor prior to final publication of the regulations.

J.  Public Comments

   Written Comments--Interested persons are invited to submit comments, suggestions, or objections regarding the proposed regulation to the Environmental Quality Board, P. O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477 (express mail: Rachel Carson State Office Building, 16th Floor, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301). Comments submitted by facsimile will not be accepted. Comments, suggestions or objections must be received by the Board by November 30, 2009. Interested persons may also submit a summary of their comments to the Board. The summary may not exceed one page in length and must also be received by the Board by November 30, 2009. The one-page summary will be provided to each member of the Board in the agenda packet distributed prior to the meeting at which the final regulation will be considered.

   Electronic Comments--Comments may be submitted electronically to the Board at RegComments@state.pa.us and must also be received by the Board by November 30, 2009. A subject heading of the proposal and a return name and address must be included in each transmission.

K.  Public Meetings and Public Hearings

   The Board will hold three public meetings to explain the proposed rulemaking and to respond to questions from meeting participants. In addition to the public meetings, the Board will hold three public hearings for the purpose of accepting comments on the proposed rulemaking. The public meetings and hearings will be held as follows:

 

September 29, 2009

Cranberry Township Municipal    Building
2525 Rochester Road
Cranberry Township, PA    16066-6499
Public Meeting: 4 p.m.
Public Hearing: 5 p.m.

October 1, 2009

Department of Environmental    Protection
Southcentral Regional Office
Susquehanna Room A
909 Elmerton Avenue
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Public Meeting: 4 p.m.
Public Hearing: 5 p.m.

October 5, 2009

Salisbury Township Municipal    Building
2900 South Pike Avenue
Allentown, PA 18103
Public Meeting: 4 p.m.
Public Hearing: 5 p.m.

 

  Persons wishing to present testimony at a hearing are requested to contact the Environmental Quality Board, P. O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477, (717) 787-4526, at least 1 week in advance of the hearing to reserve a time to present testimony. Oral testimony is limited to 10 minutes for each witness. Witnesses are requested to submit three written copies of their oral testimony to the hearing chairperson at the hearing. Organizations are limited to designating one witness to present testimony on their behalf at each hearing.

   Persons in need of accommodations as provided for in the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 should contact the Board at (717) 787-4526 or through the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay Service at (800) 654-5984 (TDD) to discuss how the Board may accommodate their needs.

 Contact Persons

   For further information contact Kenneth F. Murin, Chief, Division of Waterways, Wetlands, and Stormwater Management, P. O. Box 8775, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8775, (717) 787-6827 or Margaret O. Murphy, Assistant Counsel, Bureau of Regulatory Counsel, P. O. Box 8464, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8464, (717) 787-7060. Information regarding submitting comments on this proposal appears in Section J of this preamble. Persons with a disability may use the AT&T Relay Service by calling (800) 654-5984 (TDD users) or (800) 654-5988 (voice users). This proposal is available electronically through the DEP web site (http://www.depweb.state.pa.us).

 

 

 


Winners of EPA's First Water Quality Video Contest Announced

Winners have been announced in the EPA Water Quality Video Contest.  Out of over 250 submissions, two winners were chosen.  Visit this site to see the winners, honorable mentions, and a link to all the submissions.

http://www.epa.gov/owow/videocontest.html#winners

 

 

 

News Clips

 

Earth's Most Prominent Rainfall Feature Creeping Northward

The rain band near the equator has been moving north for over 300 years.  Research shows that climate change is the likely cause.  On average, it is moving at just less than a mile per year.  As global warming increases, the speed in which it is moving will likely increase.  This effect will have grave implications for those who live in these regions.
ScienceDaily, August 9, 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090701135535.htm

 

GPS Helps Locate Soil Erosion Pathways

A study was conducted to see if GPS could be utilized to identify areas of potential erosion.  The research showed that the maps are able to identify areas where concentrated flow is likely, but field verification would likely be necessary.  This could be applied to many uses, such as designing land developments and ecological restorations.

ScienceDaily, August 17, 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090813142504.htm

 

Growing Greener Success Stories – Celebrating a Decade of Growing Greener Watersheds

Thanks to the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds and an anonymous benefactor, two $250 grants are being provided each month to those who submit the best success story article or video highlighting a Growing Greener funded project.  Submit your own project and story to be highlighted on their website.  Visit the following link to read about other people’s projects or to submit your own.

http://www.growinggreener.com/

 

“Killer Algae” Found on Beaches in Brittany, France

Some beaches in Brittany, France are covered with “killer algae” that has sever health ristks and can lead to death.  When the green algae decomposes, it releases toxic gases (hydrogen sulfide) that led to the death of a horse.  Intensive farming leaching nitrates into the water is producing the excessive amounts of green algae.

By Christian Curtenelle, Associated Press, August 20, 2009
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/world/6580002.html
 

Volume-Based Hydrology:  Examining the Shift in Focus from Peak Flows and Pollution Treatment to Mimicking Predevelopment Volumes

The majority of stormwater management professionals focus their efforts on controlling peak flows (reducing flooding) and velocity.  Current methodology is also equally focusing on stormwater quality.  Though reducing peak flows (slowing stormwater down) is important, professionals are also focusing on reducing stormwater runoff volumes.

By Andrew J. Reese, Stormwater Journal, September 2009
http://www.stormh2o.com/september-2009/volume-based-hydrology.aspx

 

Challenges of Stream Restoration as a Stormwater Management Tool
Part 2:  Planning For Construction

The second of a three-part series on stream restoration, this article focuses on the potential challenges of a stream restoration project.  The first part was featured in our May 2009 Sustainable Environments newsletter.  It can be found by clicking on the "Previous Newsletters" link at the top of this newsletter or by clicking on "Newsletters" on the left side of the screen.

By Warren C. High, and Josh Gilman, Stormwater Journal, September 2009
http://www.stormh2o.com/september-2009/challenges-stream-restoration.aspx

 

Less Money, Taller Plants

Cutbacks to state budgets are affecting roadside vegetation maintenance.  In order to cut back, some states are changing their maintenance philosophies.  An alternative to expensive traditional manicured roadsides is installing native vegetation.  This solution cuts expenses greatly and is better for the environment.

By Janice Kasperson, Erosion Control Journal, July-August 2009
http://www.erosioncontrol.com/july-august-2009/less-money-taller.aspx

 

Climate Models Confirm More Moisture In Atmosphere Attributed to Humans

Scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory utilized 22 different computer models to evaluate water vapor changes in the atmosphere.  All of the models showed that human impacts have caused an increase in the atmospheric water vapor content, most likely due to increases in greenhouse gases.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Public Affairs News Release NR-09-08-01, August 10, 2009
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2009/NR-09-08-01.html

 

The Dance Of Water: New Insight Into Water's Strange Bulk Properties

The molecular structure of water has some idiosyncrasies.  For example, water reaches a maximum density at about four degrees Celsius (as opposed to other liquids which become denser as they get colder).  Since water is the basis of life, understanding its properties is important.  New research is explaining water’s strange properties.

ScienceDaily, August 12, 2009
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090811143716.htm

 

Porous Pavements Q&A

Porous pavement allows stormwater to percolate through the pavement, allowing for infiltration and reducing runoff.  Though its use is increasing, many do not know the details of how it works and how to utilize it for stormwater management.  This article explains the questions that are most often asked about this stormwater Best Management Practice.

By Bruce Ferguson, Stormwater Journal, September 2009
http://www.stormh2o.com/september-2009/porous-pavements-qa.aspx

 

Permeable Pavers
Part 1: Choosing products and installation methods

Permeable pavers are a low impact development (LID) best management practice (BMP) that is cost effective, addresses water quality, requires little maintenance and can be aesthetically pleasing.  They are also useful in areas where there is limited space for stormwater management controls.  This article details the types of products, maintenance, and installation methods. 

By Carol Brzozowski, Stormwater Journal, September 2009
http://www.stormh2o.com/september-2009/permeable-pavers-installation.aspx

 

For more information on Porous Pavement, see our "BMP of the Month" below.

 

 


Philadelphia’s CarbonPlus Calculator and Offset Project

An online tool, Erase Your Trace, helps Philadelphians calculate their annual carbon dioxide emissions and offset them through local tree planting.  It is designed to educate residents on their personal impact on the environment.  The project utilizes the Carbon Plus Calculator to quantify and monetize carbon output.  The average Philadelphian produces 10.2 tons of carbon dioxide annually.  At $20 per ton, the average cost per person is approximately $200 per year. 

http://www.itreetools.org/carboncalculator/index.cfm?state=PA&cityname=Philadelphia

 

 

 

Policy Update

National Fish Habitat Conservation Act of 2009 Introduced in Senate

On June 9, 2009, the National Fish Habitat Conservation Act of 2009 was introduced to the Senate.  The plan is a comprehensive strategy to provide support and funding for conservation of national waterways and fisheries. 

National fish Habitat Action Plan, June 10, 2009

http://fishhabitat.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=36:news&id=208:the-national-fish-habitat-conservation-act-of-2009-introduced-in-senate&Itemid=50

 

Eligibility for Farmable Wetlands Program Expanded

The Farmable Wetlands Program is a voluntary program for farmers.  The goal is to restore up to one million acres of farmable wetland and wetland buffers.  Farmers enter into an agreement with the USDA and agree to restore the hydrology of a wetland and plant a specified vegetated crop on adjacent wetland buffers.  The 2008 farm bill expanded the eligibility criteria and maximum allowable wetland acreage.

By Wes Nelson, USDA Farm Service Agency, West Central Tribune, August 15, 2009

http://www.agweek.com/articles/?id=5639&article_id=55935&property_id=22

 

Court Blocks Road Construction in National Forests

A federal appeals court reinstated most of a 2001 rule to prohibit commercial logging, mining and other development within 58 million acres of national forest.  This will block road construction within at least 40 million acres of pristine national forests.  However, a separate case is pending which may affect this ruling.

By Matthew Daly, The Associated Press, August 5, 2009

http://www.newsday.com/court-blocks-road-construction-in-national-forests-1.1350430

 

New Wetlands Mapping Standard Precedes National Assessment

The federal government has adopted a Wetland Mapping Standard.  This will guide digital mapping projects and create a more consistent standard for wetlands data.  The standard will assist governmental agencies to contribute data into the Service’s National Wetlands Inventory geodatabase.

Environment News Service, August 20, 2009

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2009/2009-08-20-093.asp

To view the Wetlands Mapping Standard (July 2009) document (FGDC Document Number FGDC-STD-015-2009), visit

http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/_documents/gNSDI/FGDCWetlandsMappingStandard.pdf

 

EPA is Proposing to Revise It’s Air Quality Standards for Nitrogen Dioxide

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to increase the nation’s nitrogen dioxide (NO2) standards.  The current annual standard of 53 parts per billion (ppb) will remain, and a one-hour NO2 standard between 80 and 100 ppb will be established.  Public written comments will be accepted until September 14, 2009.  For more information, go to http://www.epa.gov/air/nitrogenoxides/actions.html.

 

EPA Seeks Comments on New Information about Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide

New information would create a new class of injection well and set requirements to ensure that geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide does not endanger drinking water sources.  The EPA is considering an alternative related to the proposed injection depth requirements.  They are also evaluating the need for a more comprehensive regulatory framework.  Public comments can be made for 45 days after publication in the Federal Register.

http://www.epa.gov/safewater/uic/wells_sequestration.html

 


ReBurbia Competition Winner Announced

ReBurbia has announced the winners of their contest to redesign the suburbs.  The competition involved providing solutions to common problems in modern-day suburbia.  The grand prize was awarded to Frog’s Dream:  McMansions Turned Into Biofilter Water Treatment Plants submitted by Calvin Chin.  The design involves converting abandoned suburban developments into wetland areas to clean water produced by nearby urban centers.

http://www.inhabitat.com/2009/08/19/reburbia-competition-winners-announced/

 

 

Grants and Awards 

 

Sustain our Great Lakes Grants Program – Community Grants Program

The Community Grants Program ranges from $24,000 to $150,000 for habitat restoration, water quality improvement, and watershed planning/management.  Grants are provided to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, tribes and educational institutions that wish to improve the Great Lakes basin.  An education, training or community outreach component is encouraged.  Full proposals are due October 15, 2009.

http://www.sustainourgreatlakes.org/Apply.aspx

 

Sustain our Great Lakes Grants Program – Stewardship Grants Program

The Stewardship Grants Program ranges from $150,001 to $1,500,000 for large-scale restoration, enhancement, and protection projects.  Grants are provided to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, tribes and educational institutions that wish to improve the Great Lakes basin.  Pre-proposals are due October 1, 2009.  Invited full proposals are due December 15, 2009.

http://www.sustainourgreatlakes.org/Apply.aspx

 

WREN (Water Resources Education Network) Community Grants

Grants ranging from $100 to $300 are provided for community based watershed education initiatives, depending on the scope of activities.  The deadline is now September 30, 2009.

http://wren.palwv.org/grants/documents/2009OpportunityGrantApplicationwatershed.doc

 

PA DEP Coastal Zone Management

Grants are provided for studies, plans designs, programs, land acquisitions, research and small construction projects within the Delaware Estuary and Lake Erie Coastal Zones.  Applications due October 23, 2009.

http://www.dep.state.pa.us/grantscenter/ProgramSummary.asp?ID=5

 

PA DEP Coastal Resources Management Program

2010 Coastal Zone Grants sub-grant awards are made to state and local agencies and incorporated nonprofit organization in the Delaware Estuary or Lake Erie Coastal Zones.

http://www.dep.state.pa.us/river/grants/crmgrants/crmgrants.htm

 

PA DEP Enactment of Ordinances and Implementation of Stormwater Management Plans

This program reimburses municipalities for costs associated with adopting or revising ordinances to comply with the Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act. 

http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/watershedmgmt/cwp/view.asp?a=1437&q=518836&watershedmgmtNav=|

 

PA DEP Environmental Education Grants Program

This program supports environmental education through schools, conservation districts, educational organizations and nonprofit organizations.  Application deadline is December 12. 

http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/enved/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=473483&envedNav=|

 

Fund for Wild Nature

The fund for Wild Nature provides funding for campaigns focused on saving and restoring native plant species and ecosystems. The deadline is November 1, 2009.

http://www.fundwildnature.org/proposal.html

 

Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Electronic Grants System

The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources provides eGrants, an electronic grants system that contains all available DCNR grants.  Applications can be submitted online.

https://www.grants.dcnr.state.pa.us/index.aspx

 

Keystone Historic Preservation Grant Program

This grant is available to nonprofits and local governments for preserving, restoring, and/or rehabilitating historic resources.  It is a competitive matching grant with a maximum award of $100,000.  Application submission deadline is March 1, 2010.

http://www.artsnet.org/phmc/grants.htm#clg

 

Conservation Easement Assistance Program

Provided by the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association, this program assists with transaction costs for conservation easements, for a total of $5,000 per easement transaction.  The program assists with completing conservation and trail easements, amending and restating older easements, establishing or updating baseline documentation and installing signs on eased properties.

www.conserveland.org/ceap

 

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Initiative

Under the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Initiative (CBWI), eligible landowners can use available technical and financial assistance to address soil erosion, sedimentation, and excess nutrients in streams and waterways, as well as other related natural resource concerns such as air quality, wetlands, wildlife habitat, and forestry. Applications for CBWI will be accepted continuously and evaluated on a monthly basis. To apply, farmers must fill out an application form and contact their local NRCS office. Pennsylvania agricultural producers located within the Chesapeake Bay watershed may be eligible to apply.

http://www.pa.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cbwi/index.html

 

Chesapeake Bay Trust Mini Grants

This program provides up to $5,000.00 for projects that focus on the Chesapeake Bay Trust's priorities.  These grants are typically used for educational purposes, small projects, and public awareness initiatives.  Grant applications will be considered until funds are exhausted.

http://www.cbtrust.org/site/c.enJIKQNoFiG/b.2028473/k.BBF6/Mini_Grant_Program.htm

 

Chesapeake Bay Trust Restoration Grant Program

Projects should address the three goals of the Restoration grant Program, including accomplishing a restoration project that can also be used to showcase a restoration technique and engages citizens in the project.  Application deadline is December 4, 2009.  Applications will be accepted starting September 1, 2009.

http://www.cbtrust.org/site/c.enJIKQNoFiG/b.5130211/k.7B54/Restoration_Grant_Program.htm

 

Chesapeake Bay Trust and Maryland DNR Watershed Assistance Grant Program

This program is provided for local governments and non-profit organizations for projects that improve water quality in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and Maryland Coastal Bays.  Application deadline is October 2, 2009.

http://www.cbtrust.org/site/c.enJIKQNoFiG/b.4764263/k.2F67/Watershed_Assistance_Grant_Program.htm

 

American Water Environmental Grant Program

Grants are provided for projects that improve, restore or protect a watershed. 

http://www.amwater.com/Ensuring-Water-Quality/environmental-grants-program.html

1675 Foundation
This foundation offers support to organizations for arts/culture, education, the environment, health, human services and history.  Priority is given to Philadelphia and Chester
Counties.  Grants ranging from $2,000 to $50,000 are available to organizations that are tax exempt under IRS Code 501(c)(3) or public charities under IRS Code 509(a).  Applications are due March 1 and October 1 of each year.
http://www.1675foundation.org/guidelines.htm

Bridgestone Americas Trust Fund
This Trust provides charities with funding to support education, the environment/conservation, or children’s programs. 

http://www.bridgestone-firestone.com/trustfund.asp

William Penn Foundation Grants

This foundation provides grants that protect, conserve, and restore water resources that drain to the Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers

http://www.williampennfoundation.org/info-url_nocat3569/info-url_nocat.htm

 

The Maryland Urban and Community Forest Committee (MUCFC) Grants

The Maryland Urban and Community Forest Committee (MUCFC) is providing maximum grants of $1,500 to projects for tree planting and care.  Grants are reviewed on or about September 15, February 15 and June 15.

http://www.dnr.state.md.us/forests/programs/urban/grantapp.pdf

 

WWEMA/WWD 2009 Student Scholarship

The Water & Wastewater Equipment Manufactures Association (WWEMA) and Water & Wastes Digest (WWD) is providing a $1,000 student scholarship for a student accepted to a college or university in this area of study.  Applicants must have a parent employed by a WWEMA-member company.  An application can be requested by e-mail at wwdeditor@sgcmail.com or by calling 847.391.1011.

 

PennVEST Loans – Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority

Loans are provided for drinking water, wastewater and stormwater loans, on-lot sewage disposal funds, and Brownfield redevelopment.

http://www.pennvest.state.pa.us/pennvest/cwp/browse.asp?A=4

 

Pennsylvania Pollution Prevention Assistance Program (PPAA) Loans

This program provides loans for small businesses to implement pollution prevention and energy-efficiency projects.  Funding is provided at a 2% interest rate, up to a 10 year term for 75% of the project cost, up to a maximum of $100,000.00.  This program may be used by businesses in Pennsylvania with 100 or less full-time employees for the acquisition and installation of machinery and equipment.

http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/enintech/cwp/view.asp?a=1413&q=503114

 

Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Grants Page

The PHMC offers many grants covering topics such as Historical Markers, Technical Assistance, Certified Local Governments, and more.

http://www.artsnet.org/phmc/grants.htm#clg

 

NY DEC Statewide Water Quality Improvements Projects Program

This program provides reimbursement grants to municipalities, soil and water conservation districts, and non-profit organizations.  Applicable projects include municipal wastewater treatment, municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), nonagricultural nonpoint source abatement and control, aquatic habitat restoration, and water quality management.  These grants can cover up to 75% to 85% of the total project cost.  Application deadline is October 16, 2009.

http://www.dec.ny.gov/pubs/56080.html

 

Solar Energy Education for Local Governments

The U.S. Department of Energy is providing funding for local governments to accelerate solar energy implementation and workforce development. Applications due October 15, 2009.

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/progress_alerts.cfm/pa_id=198

 

Building Healthy Communities Grant Program

Grants are provided to registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations, public schools or tax-exempt public agencies in the U.S. in the form of The Home Depot gift cards for purchasing tools and/or materials.  A maximum of $2,500 is provided for organizations using volunteers to improve the health of their communities.  Applications are due September 15, 2009 and December 15, 2009.
http://corporate.homedepot.com/wps/portal/!ut/p/c1/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3gDdwNHH0sfE3M3AzMPJ8MAVxcDKADKR2LKmxrD5fHr9vPIz03VL8iNKAcASzGzVw!!/dl2/d1/L2dJQSEvUUt3QS9ZQnB3LzZfMEcwQUw5TDQ3RjA2SEIxUE9EMDAwMDAwMDA!/

 

USDA Rural Development Water and Waste Disposal (WWD) Loan and Grant Program for Rural Areas

This program provides loans, grants, loan guarantees and technical assistance for water, sanitary, waste and storm drainage facilities in rural areas and towns of 10,000 or less.  Assistance is provided to public entities, non-profit organizations and federally recognized Indian tribes.  Applications are accepted continually. 

http://www.usda.gov/rus/water/program.htm

 

USDA Technical Assistance and Training Grants for Rural Areas

These grants are provided for identifying solutions for water and waste disposal problems, assist in preparing applications for water and waste grants, and improving operations and maintenance of existing facilities.  Private non-profit organizations located in rural areas and towns of 10,000 or less are eligible.  Applications accepted October 1 through December 31 every year.

http://www.usda.gov/rus/water/tatg.htm

 

USDA Solid Waste Management Grant Program for Rural Areas

These grants are provided to public bodies, private non-profit organizations and Native American tribes for reducing/eliminating pollution of water resources and improving planning/management of solid waste sties in rural areas.  Applications accepted October 1 through December 31 every year.

http://www.usda.gov/rus/water/SWMG.htm

 

PA Resource Enhancement and Protection Program (REAP)

This program provides farmers and business with tax credits in exchange for Best Management Practices (BMPs) on agricultural operations to enhance production and protect natural resources.  Applications will be accepted till fiscal year 2009-2010 appropriations are committed to projects.

http://www.agriculture.state.pa.us/agriculture/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=145155

 

Gannett Foundation – Community Action Grants

Funds are granted to provide education/neighborhood improvement, economic development, youth development, community problem-solving, assistance to disadvantaged people, environmental conservation and cultural enrichment.  Applications are due February 16 and August 17 each year.

http://www.gannettfoundation.org/guidelines.htm

 

H2O PA – High Hazard Unsafe Dam Projects

Grants between $500,000 and $20,000,000 are provided to municipalities, municipal authorities, the Commonwealth and independent agencies for projects that repair, rehabilitate, or remove all or some of a high hazards unsafe dam.

http://www.newpa.com/find-and-apply-for-funding/funding-and-program-finder/funding-detail/index.aspx?progId=190

 

The Nature Conservancy’s 2009 Photo Contest

Submit your picture showing the beauty of nature.  Subjects can including land, water, plants animals and/or people in nature.  Applicants are encouraged to show a wide range of habitats (forest, meadows, lakes, rivers, deserts, rainforests, marine and coral reefs, etc) around the world.  Your picture, if selected, could be included in the 2011 Nature Conservancy’s calendar.  Submission deadline is September 30, 2009.   

http://support.nature.org/site/PageServer?pagename=contest_ph6&autologin=true


$250 Grants for Growing Greener Stories

Here's your chance to share your story of how the Growing Greener Watershed Restoration Program has made a real difference in improving your watershed.  $250.00 will be awarded each month to the best article/video  between now and December 15.  The submission should describe the project, water quality improvements, education programs, and how Growing Greener helped you achieve your goals. These grants have been provided by an anonymous benefactor to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of the Growing Greener Program.
http://www.growinggreener.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=60&Itemid=65

 

 

 

Photo Mosaic – US Fish and Wildlife Service

Submit a photo to be added to a mosaic showcasing nature in the places you visited this summer.  You will be able to find your photo among the hundreds (if not thousands) of pictures by performing a search.

http://yououtdoors.org/
 

 

Link Of The Month
 

Green Values Stormwater Management Calculator

This calculator is helpful in evaluating sustainable design opportunities.  It gives you an idea of the benefits and costs associated with different design options.  The calculator provides an estimate based on available research and data.  It is based on the hydrology of the Great Lakes region, and may not be accurate for other regions. 

http://logan.cnt.org//calculator/calculator.php

 

 

BMP of the Month

BMP of the Month:  Porous Pavement
Porous (or pervious) pavement consists of a permeable surface course laid on top of a stone bed.  It reduces stormwater runoff volumes (through infiltration), reduces peak stormwater flows (by storing stormwater within the stone bed), and improves water quality (through infiltration).   Porous pavement can consist of pervious bituminous asphalt, pervious concrete, pervious paver blocks, or reinforced turf and gravel filled grids.

EPA Porous Pavement Fact Sheet
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index.cfm?action=browse&Rbutton=detail&bmp=71

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual
http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/View/Collection-8305

If you are interested in reducing your stormwater runoff, F. X. Browne, Inc. can help!  We can utilize porous pavement in your project to meet federal, state, and local stormwater management requirements and enhance the aesthetic and ecological value of your property.

Tools and Publications

EPA Launches Bay TMDL Web Site

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has launched a web site focused on the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL).  It’s goal is to assist the public in being aware of key developments, draft work products, public meetings/events scheduling, and Q&A.  The TDML will address the needed reductions in nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment in the Bay.   

http://www.epa.gov/chesapeakebaytmdl

 

EPA Releases New Guidebook to Encourage Smarter Community Design and Healthier Living for Seniors

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released this guidebook to educate older adults about the importance of environmentally friendly community design and “smart growth.”  It provides information, links to resources, and a self-assessment tool for communities to rate themselves.

http://www.epa.gov/aging/bhc/guide/index.html 

 

Corps of Engineers Regional Supplement to Wetland Delineation Manual

A Draft Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement to the 1987 Westland Delineation Manual has been released.  It is applicable to the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regions located within the District of Columbia, Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.

http://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Documents/cecwo/reg/EMP_Peer_Rev.pdf

 

Sustainable Water Systems:  Step One – Redefining the Nation’s Infrastructure Challenge

This report focuses on water and wastewater infrastructure, and how the traditional view (reservoirs, pipes, treatment plants, etc.) should be expanded to include natural watersheds (rivers, forests, wetlands, etc.).

http://www.aspeninstitute.org/policy-work/energy-environment/our-policy-work/dialogue-sustainable-water-infrastructure-united-stat

 

Stormwater Information for Homeowners

The Delaware State Division of Soil & Water Conservation is providing this website for home owners.  The website includes stormwater fact sheets, guidebooks, and brochures and provides information on native and invasive plant species.

http://www.swc.dnrec.delaware.gov/Drainage/Pages/Homeowners.aspx

 

New York Green Building Database

GreenHomeNYC provides a website with detailed profiles of “green” buildings within New York City.  Their mission is to encourage the use of sustainable building methods and materials by building owners in NYC. 

http://greenhomenyc.org/bldgs

 

Brownfields Policy Research Newsletter:  July 2009

Produced by the Northeast/Midwest Institute (NEMW), this newsletter includes information and links to recent reports and white papers relating to energy, Brownfield’s, and sustainability.  It also provides the Center for Neighborhood Technology’s (CNT’s) new Mapping Tool that shows the relationship between the urban lifestyle and climate change. 

http://nemw.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=144&Itemid=215
 

Transforming a Brownfield in Baltimore

Produced by Greg Lewis of the Northeast-Midwest Institute (NEMW), this case study explains the transformation of a Baltimore factory into a mixed-use structure. 

http://www.nemw.org/images/stories/documents/Baltimore_Disadvantaged_Comm_Article.pdf

 

Online Toolkit for Creating Open Space Campaigns

Provided by the Conservation Campaign (TCC), this online toolkit is designed to assist local activists initiate, conduct and win public campaigns for preserving open space and crating parks.  It includes a campaign guide, case studies, and more. 

http://www.conservationcampaign.org/

They also have a report entitled Conservation: An Investment that Pays, which makes the case for conservation as a long-term economic investment. 

http://www.tpl.org/tier3_cd.cfm?content_item_id=23056&folder_id=188

 

EPA White Paper:  Adaptation Planning for the National Estuary Program

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released this white paper, which discusses five critical elements of adaptive planning in estuaries. Estuaries in the National Estuary Program (NEP) should utilize these elements to achieve recognition as a Climate Ready Estuary (CRE).

http://www.epa.gov/cre/downloads/CREAdaptationPlanning-Final.pdf

 

Online Searchable Database:  Maryland 2008 Integrated Report of Surface Water Quality

This database allows users to learn about the water quality status of waters in Maryland and to view summary information.

http://www.mde.state.md.us/ResearchCenter/Publications/General/eMDE/vol3no11/database.asp

 

i-Tree Tools for Assessing and Managing Community Forests

This software suite provided by the USDA Forest Service analyses urban forestry and provides benefits assessment tools.  Whether your site is small (your property) or large (your state), this tool will help you quantify and assess the community of trees and the environmental services that they provide.

www.itreetools.com


 

The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission News Releases:

 

ASMFC Striped Bass Board Approves Draft Addendum II for Public Comment

The Draft Addendum II has been approved for public comment until 5:00 PM (EST) October 8, 2009.  It proposes to allow unused coastal commercial quota of striped bass to be carried over to the next year, unless fish mortality rates or spawning stock biomass do not reach the Plan’s targets.  You can contribute your thoughts at a public hearing or through written comments.  Copies can be obtained by calling (202) 289-6400 or by visiting www.asmfc.org under Breaking News.  Public comment should be forwarded to Nichola Meserve, FMP Coordinator, 1444 ‘Eye’ Street, NW, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 289-6051 by fax, or at comments@asmfc.org (Subject Line:  Draft Addendum II).

 

ASMFC Shad & River Herring Board Approves Draft Amendment 3 for Public Comment

Draft Amendment 3 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Shad and River Herring has been approved for public comment until 5:00 PM on October 15, 2009.  It proposes to protect, enhance, and restore American Shad stocks through monitoring and management measures.  You can contribute your thoughts at a public hearing or through written comments.  Copies can be obtained by calling (202) 289-6400 or by visiting www.asmfc.org under Breaking News.  Public comment should be forwarded to Kate Taylor, FMP Coordinator, 1444 ‘Eye’ Street, NW, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 289-6051 by fax, or at comments@asmfc.org (Subject Line:  Draft Amendment 3). 

ASMFC Spiny Dogfish and Coastal Shark Board Approves Addendum I to the Interstate Shark FMP

Addendum I to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Atlantic Coastal Sharks has been approved.  It allows commercial fishermen to remove fins from March through June (dorsal fins shall be left attached to smooth dogfish carcasses from July through February).  It also removes smooth dogfish recreational possession limits and the two-hour net check requirements for large mesh grillnets.  You can view the document by visiting www.asmfc.org under Breaking News.  For more information, you can contact Christopher Vonderweidt, Fishery Management Plan Coordinator, at cvonderweidt@asmfc.org or (202) 289-6400.

 

 

 

Newsletter Editor/Design: 
Lisen Cummings

 

Subscribe to this newsletter!     
An email version of F. X. Browne, Inc.'s Sustainable Environments is now available. To be added to our mailing list, please visit http://www.fxbrowne.com/subscribe.

 

F. X. Browne, Inc.  – Environmental Consulting

F. X. Browne, Inc.
 Engineers – Planners – Scientists
31 Years of Excellence & Innovation

SERVICES

Lake and Water Quality Studies
Watershed Management Programs
Bioengineering Projects
Stormwater Management
Watershed Inventories
Water Quality Monitoring
Laboratory Services
Water Quality & Watershed Modeling
Open Space Planning
Water & Wastewater Planning and Design
Low-Impact Development
Geographic Information Systems
Public Education and Seminars
Wetlands Consulting Services

Corporate Office: Lansdale, PA
Pocono Office: Marshalls Creek, PA
New York Office: Saranac Lake, NY

For more information, call us at (215) 362-3878 or visit: http://www.fxbrowne.com